Searching For Savvy

Entries categorized as ‘Uncategorized’

Cinematic Savvy: The Dark Knight

July 28, 2008 · 1 Comment

The Cinematic Savvy series is designed to explore themes and ideas from certain films. Inspiration can be drawn from characters, their quotes, their circumstances, historical approaches depicted – it’s my blog, I’ll take it where I get it. I love film and I love PR. Let’s see how they influence me.

Come on. You knew it was coming. This blog started out with a post about Batman so why shouldn’t the franchise be included in the “Cinematic Savvy” series?

Now, this was an incredibly delicate situation. Heath Ledger was already inspiring much anticipation for the film before his death. Reports of his extensive and seemingly obsessive preparation for the role were rampant. His death only heightened that anticipation, enlarging and redefining the audience to movie-goers who might not be interested in the story, but would absolutely go to see the actor’s last film.

Image courtesy of www.batman-movie-buzz.com

Image courtesy of www.batman-movie-buzz.com

In my first post, Saving Face, I addressed the question of how publicity for the Dark Knight should continue, giving the film the publicity and energy it needed while still respecting the actors death for what it was, a death and not an opportunity on which to capitalize.

PRWeek, in an effort to not only answer that original question, took it a step further and asked what the result was. In an article asking whether or not the publicity campaign for the Dark Knight was a hit or miss, called it a hit attributing its success to the ‘posthumous Oscar debate’ which ultimately drove attention to the dead actor and his performance rather than to the overall genius of the film all the while driving massive profit.

Another lesson in reputation management, crisis management and ethics all at the same time for this PR novice.

Categories: Crisis managenment · Ethics · Film industry · Promotion · entertainment
Tagged: , , , , ,

Let’s Get To It

February 18, 2008 · Leave a Comment

In a recent post from Kelli Matthew’s blog, external and internal client-PR professional relationships are discussed and seven suggestions are included on how to maximize mutually beneficial rapport. Mark McClennan of Schwartz Communications “Crossroads” blog also explores this topic with a Valentine’s Day twist, “moving forward from PR puppy love”, and encourages PR practitioners to make their relationships meaningful. I suppose I’d never thought of this relationship as anything more than professional discourse, an exchange of services for fees.

In comparing the two blogs to my own limited agency and client experience, I decided to analyze how I measure up to these tips for successful PR professional to client relationships. My current client moves slowly when it comes to acting on the PR resources that my team prepares for them. This is understandable because, as a non-profit, they have to be careful and make wise decisions about the publicity tactics in which they invest. Most of our PR work is preparing online media resources for our client: website features, Google ad space, blogs, etc. We want them to be not only available online but also internet savvy since many people will probably research their products and resources before purchasing them.

What ends up happening is that they are hesitant to jump on projects that my team has painstakingly prepared because we are in total belief that they are useful tools for what the organization wishes to accomplish. One thing that might contribute to a potential relationship problem is that we see ourselves as a separate entity from the organization rather than team players striving toward the same goal. As we work toward their goals we must understand that their goals are our goals and hopefully our methods will become their methods.

Kelli and Mark have some good suggestions on ways to succor this situation and most of them, if not all, deal with communication. Weird. And crazy since this is a communication-based practice.

The thing that made my little PR ears perk up was number 3 on Kelli’s blog: Seek a peer-to-peer relationship. This might prove difficult in my case because my client and my team aren’t peers. The PR team is a group of student interns and the client is a non-profit organization that has been doing what they do for decades. Kelli’s post suggests turning the project into a “joint venture environment” and showing the client that my team also has a vested interest in the results of the PR strategy. This makes sense, because, really, we do. We want our press releases and FAQ’s to get published so that when we’re looking for jobs, we can refer back to the work we’ve done. Our client wants publicity for their cause. These basic goals make our involvement in the project personal and ensure a healthy professional relationship as explored in Mark’s blog.

It was actually very clever. He uses somewhat cliched relationship jargon (ie. communication, commitment, compromise) and applied them to the professional relationships. I liked his point on commitment the best. He asserts that committing to both the project and the client are key because inattention and ignorance of the “little things” do not go unnoticed.

Lastly, I read an article this afternoon by Elizabeth Albrycht, Founding Fellow of the Society for New Communications Research which said something that resonated with me and this subject in particular. The purpose of public relations is to foster trust between clients and their publics which is compounded from the trust of clients and their PR practitioner. The article also states that the measurement of a good relationship is gagued by how much each party is invested based on their engagement.

This is the conundrum of public relations. The success of a plan or strategy cannot be measured in the work itself but rather how the parties involved were influenced and engaged by the work.

The above mentioned article actually had some good things to say about social media and how to stimulate a client’s interest in it. I suggest a read-through for those interest. You can find it here.

*Image courtesy of www.derbigum.com

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Does The NYT Hate Giuliani? And If So, Does It Matter?

February 11, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Along the campaign trail, “America’s Governor”, Rudy Guiliani has endured some hits from the New York Times. Much of what is published seems mean-spirited. The “Times” has been accused of being leftist and Guiliani is, afterall, a GOP candidate. However, they snubbed him in their candidate endorsements, favoring Arizona Senator, John McCain instead as well as Hilary Clinton over Barak Obama.In May of last year, the NYT published a story that remarks on Guiliani’s image evolution, saying that his tough exterior we knew from his New York Governorship days has remolded into a cheerful demeanor. Online news service, the Gothamist, has also seemed to notice the NYT’s dislike of the potential Guiliani presidency. In a story posted on January 25th, cites a Times story in which they said Giuliani’s arrogance and bad judgement “breathtaking”. The Times article also accused the former governor of turning “the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business”. Whether these accusations and criticisms are true or not, the Gothamist’s article asserts that these “attacks” from the NYT only make the presidential candidate look more sympathetic. Not that it helped him out that much. He dropped out of the race before Super Tuesday.A recent article at PR Week.com goes into the time-honored tradition of campaign endorsements and how they have become political powerhouses when it election day comes. The article discusses union and newspaper endorsements and the featured image shows Barak Obama with Ted Kennedy and Carolyn Kennedy in the background, referencing their recent endorsements of his campaign. The author of the article, Marc Longpre, said that from a communications stand-point, endorsements make a huge difference as far as how voters are reached.According to this article, the answer to the second question in the title of this post is: YES. With high-profile political nods, for instance, a union endorsement, a campaign is able to reach a large number of voters affiliated with the union and they are also able to count on the union as a huge source of word-of-mouth campaigning.From a communications standpoint, it absolutely mattered whether or not a juggernaut medium like The New York Times favored their state’s former governor or not. Especially as a mass media tool, they can announce their endorsement and then publish story after story and op-ed after op-ed proving their point. How was Giuliani, who, in truth, didn’t have much else besides the “America’s Governor” thing going for him, supposed to hurdle that publicity blow?

*Photo courtesy of FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog

Categories: Uncategorized